Level 2 · System and Information Integrity

SI.L2-3.14.2

Malicious Code Protection

Malicious-code protection needs defined locations and working coverage at those locations.

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible
✓ Level 1 coverage included: SI.L1-b.1.xiii ↓
GAVII Cybersecurity assessment reference

Official reference

The requirement

Provide protection from malicious code at designated locations within organizational systems.

DoD CMMC Assessment Guide, Level 2, version 2.13. SI.L2-3.14.2; requirement and objectives, printed page 249 ↗

Assessment objectives

What must be established

Determine if each applicable objective is satisfied. The labels below follow the cited DoD assessment guide.

  1. [a]

    designated locations for malicious code protection are identified; and

  2. [b]

    protection from malicious code at designated locations is provided.

MET requires evidence that all applicable objectives are satisfied. Final, approved evidence is needed. A NOT APPLICABLE determination needs a scope-based basis and is equivalent to MET for scoring. Enduring exceptions and temporary deficiencies have specific conditions under 32 CFR 170.24; they are not a general permission to defer implementation.

Included Level 1 coverage · FCI

SI.L1-b.1.xiii: Malicious Code Protection

Malicious-code protection should cover the locations selected for the FCI system.

Level 2 includes Level 1 safeguarding coverage. This is the FAR-based Level 1 assessment context mapped into the 110-requirement library, not an additional Level 2 requirement.

Provide protection from malicious code at appropriate locations within organizational information systems.

DoD CMMC Assessment Guide, Level 1: SI.L1-b.1.xiii; requirement and objectives, printed page 42 ↗

Level 1 assessment objectives and guidance

Determine if:

  1. [a]

    designated locations for malicious code protection are identified; and

  2. [b]

    protection from malicious code at designated locations is provided.

Identify the relevant protection points and verify that protection is present and functioning. A subscription or license count does not demonstrate coverage.

Examine

Compare designated locations with deployment records, active protection settings, and health information.

Interview

How is a device with missing or disabled protection discovered?

Demonstrate or test

Inspect representative coverage and use a vendor-approved benign validation method where appropriate.

Level 1 evidence gaps

  • Protection is assumed because software was purchased.
  • An unmanaged endpoint is missing from coverage.

Level 1 has no weighted deduction. All applicable requirements must be fully implemented; the self-assessment is MET or NOT MET in its entirety.

Level 1 does not permit a POA&M. CAP P.11 addresses Level 2 certification planning, not a mandatory on-site rule for Level 1 self-assessments. Choose evidence and observations adequate to evaluate the actual physical environment and applicable objectives.

GAVII Cybersecurity assessment approach

Connect the objective to the evidence

Identify the relevant endpoints, services, and other selected protection points. Licensing a security product does not show that agents or controls are deployed, active, and appropriate to the selected locations.

Assessment focus: objectives [a], [b]. Use the methods together; a single example does not establish every objective.

Examine

Compare designated protection locations with deployment inventories, policy status, and representative health records.

Interview

How do you discover a system that lacks protection or has a disabled agent?

Demonstrate or test

Inspect coverage for representative assets and use a vendor-approved benign test method where appropriate.

Evidence gaps to look for

  • The license count is used as evidence of coverage.
  • Unmanaged or unsupported assets are omitted without analysis.

GAVII Cybersecurity’s examples illustrate ways to examine, interview, and test. They are not a mandatory artifact list or a guarantee of an assessment result. Combine methods and address every applicable objective in the actual scope.

Assessment constraints

Scoring and POA&M eligibility

Score: 5

If this requirement is NOT MET, deduct 5 points from the Level 2 maximum of 110. The deduction applies to the requirement, not separately to each objective.

Scoring rule ↗

POA&M: Not eligible

This requirement has a deduction greater than 1 point and does not qualify for the limited encryption exception. It cannot be deferred on the POA&M used for Conditional Level 2 status.

POA&M rule ↗

Conditional Level 2 requires a score of at least 88 out of 110 and satisfaction of every eligibility condition. A 1-point requirement is not automatically eligible. The permitted POA&M must be closed through the appropriate closeout assessment within 180 days of the Conditional CMMC Status Date. An operational remediation plan does not confer Conditional Status.

Assessment planning

Location and observation

Not specifically listed in CAP P.11

This requirement is not specifically listed in CAP P.11. That does not establish that remote assessment is sufficient: the Lead CCA and C3PAO determine an adequate approach for the actual scope and evidence.

CAP §P.11, pages 10–11 ↗

Check the source

References and related requirements

Program timing and contract applicability can change independently of these requirements. Check current DoD program notices and your solicitation or contract before making a compliance decision. Open the official DoD resource hub.

Get your free consultation.