GAVII Cybersecurity assessment reference

CMMC Control Explorer

Find security requirements, assessment objectives, evidence examples, and the constraints that affect your assessment.

110 Level 2 requirementsLevel 1 coverage included

110 cumulative requirements · 320 Level 2 objectives · Includes the safeguards mapped from the 15 Level 1 FAR requirements.

110 Level 2 requirements

Sorted by requirement
AC.L2-3.1.1Access Control

Authorized Access Control

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: AC.L1-b.1.i

A current account inventory connects every user, process, and device to an authorization decision.

View 6 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Limit system access to authorized users, processes acting on behalf of authorized users, and devices (including other systems).

Determine if:

  1. [a]authorized users are identified;
  2. [b]processes acting on behalf of authorized users are identified;
  3. [c]devices (and other systems) authorized to connect to the system are identified;
  4. [d]system access is limited to authorized users;
  5. [e]system access is limited to processes acting on behalf of authorized users; and
  6. [f]system access is limited to authorized devices (including other systems).
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.2Access Control

Transaction & Function Control

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: AC.L1-b.1.ii

Authorization must define what a user can do after signing in, not merely whether the user can log in.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Limit system access to the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the types of transactions and functions that authorized users are permitted to execute are defined; and
  2. [b]system access is limited to the defined types of transactions and functions for authorized users.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.3Access Control

Control CUI Flow

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

A data-flow decision needs an approved route and an enforcement mechanism at each relevant boundary.

View 5 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Control the flow of CUI in accordance with approved authorizations.

Determine if:

  1. [a]information flow control policies are defined;
  2. [b]methods and enforcement mechanisms for controlling the flow of CUI are defined;
  3. [c]designated sources and destinations (e.g., networks, individuals, and devices) for CUI within the system and between interconnected systems are identified;
  4. [d]authorizations for controlling the flow of CUI are defined; and
  5. [e]approved authorizations for controlling the flow of CUI are enforced.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.4Access Control

Separation of Duties

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Separation of duties should address specific incompatible activities, not only separate job titles.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Separate the duties of individuals to reduce the risk of malevolent activity without collusion.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the duties of individuals requiring separation are defined;
  2. [b]responsibilities for duties that require separation are assigned to separate individuals; and
  3. [c]access privileges that enable individuals to exercise the duties that require separation are granted to separate individuals.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.5Access Control

Least Privilege

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Least privilege is an explicit decision about necessary authority and an operational way to enforce it.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Employ the principle of least privilege, including for specific security functions and privileged accounts.

Determine if:

  1. [a]privileged accounts are identified;
  2. [b]access to privileged accounts is authorized in accordance with the principle of least privilege;
  3. [c]se curity functions are identified; and
  4. [d]access to security functions is authorized in accordance with the principle of least privilege.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.6Access Control

Non-Privileged Account Use

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Daily email and browsing should not inherit the authority used for security administration.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Use non-privileged accounts or roles when accessing nonsecurity functions.

Determine if:

  1. [a]nonsecurity functions are identified; and
  2. [b]users are required to use non-privileged accounts or roles when accessing nonsecurity functions.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.7Access Control

Privileged Functions

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Privilege restrictions and privileged-action logging are two separate evidence questions.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Prevent non-privileged users from executing privileged functions and capture the execution of such functions in audit logs.

Determine if:

  1. [a]privileged functions are defined;
  2. [b]non-privileged users are defined;
  3. [c]non-privileged users are prevented from executing privileged functions; and
  4. [d]the execution of privileged functions is captured in audit logs.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.8Access Control

Unsuccessful Logon Attempts

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

A failed-logon policy must be implemented consistently at the authentication points that protect the scope.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Limit unsuccessful logon attempts.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the means of limiting unsuccessful logon attempts is defined; and
  2. [b]the defined means of limiting unsuccessful logon attempts is implemented.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.9Access Control

Privacy & Security Notices

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

A notice should appear where users actually encounter the protected system and reflect applicable CUI rules.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Provide privacy and security notices consistent with applicable CUI rules.

Determine if:

  1. [a]privacy and security notices required by CUI-specified rules are identified, consistent, and associated with the specific CUI category; and
  2. [b]privacy and security notices are displayed.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.10Access Control

Session Lock

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

A session lock must stop access and hide previously visible information after the defined idle period.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Use session lock with pattern-hiding displays to prevent access and viewing of data after a period of inactivity.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the period of inactivity after which the system initiates a session lock is defined;
  2. [b]access to the system and viewing of data is prevented by initiating a session lock after the defined period of inactivity; and
  3. [c]previously visible information is concealed via a pattern-hiding display after the defined period of inactivity.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.11Access Control

Session Termination

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Automatic session termination needs a defined trigger and evidence that the system enforces it.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Terminate (automatically) a user session after a defined condition.

Determine if:

  1. [a]conditions requiring a user session to terminate are defined; and
  2. [b]a user session is automatically terminated after any of the defined conditions occur.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.12Access Control

Control Remote Access

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Remote access is an inventory and monitoring problem as well as a connection policy.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Monitor and control remote access sessions.

Determine if:

  1. [a]remote access sessions are permitted;
  2. [b]the types of permitted remote access are identified;
  3. [c]remote access sessions are controlled; and
  4. [d]remote access sessions are monitored.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.13Access Control

Remote Access Confidentiality

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Confidentiality must cover the actual remote-access session, including the protocol and cryptographic configuration in use.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Employ cryptographic mechanisms to protect the confidentiality of remote access sessions.

Determine if:

  1. [a]cryptographic mechanisms to protect the confidentiality of remote access sessions are identified; and
  2. [b]cryptographic mechanisms to protect the confidentiality of remote access sessions are implemented.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.14Access Control

Remote Access Routing

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Managed access points make remote connections governable only if alternate routes are also addressed.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Route remote access via managed access control points.

Determine if:

  1. [a]managed access control points are identified and implemented; and
  2. [b]remote access is routed through managed network access control points.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.15Access Control

Privileged Remote Access

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Remote administrative authority must be specifically authorized, not inferred from general remote access.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Authorize remote execution of privileged commands and remote access to security-relevant information.

Determine if:

  1. [a]privileged commands authorized for remote execution are identified;
  2. [b]security-relevant information authorized to be accessed remotely is identified;
  3. [c]the execution of the identified privileged commands via remote access is authorized; and
  4. [d]access to the identified security-relevant information via remote access is authorized.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.16Access Control

Wireless Access Authorization

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Wireless connectivity needs an authorization decision before a connection is allowed.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Authorize wireless access prior to allowing such connections.

Determine if:

  1. [a]wireless access points are identified; and
  2. [b]wireless access is authorized prior to allowing such connections.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.17Access Control

Wireless Access Protection

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Wireless protection requires both authentication and encryption on the paths that carry scoped traffic.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Protect wireless access using authentication and encryption.

Determine if:

  1. [a]wireless access to the system is protected using authentication; and
  2. [b]wireless access to the system is protected using encryption.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.18Access Control

Mobile Device Connection

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Mobile-device admission should follow a defined decision about which devices may connect and under what conditions.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Control connection of mobile devices.

Determine if:

  1. [a]mobile devices that process, store, or transmit CUI are identified;
  2. [b]mobile device connections are authorized; and
  3. [c]mobile device connections are monitored and logged.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.19Access Control

Encrypt CUI on Mobile

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Mobile encryption evidence must follow the CUI, including local copies and removable storage used by the platform.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Encrypt CUI on mobile devices and mobile computing platforms.

Determine if:

  1. [a]mobile devices and mobile computing platforms that process, store, or transmit CUI are identified; and
  2. [b]encryption is employed to protect CUI on identified mobile devices and mobile computing platforms.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.20Access Control

External Connections

Score: 1 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: AC.L1-b.1.iii

An external connection needs identified use, verification, and enforceable limits.

View 6 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Verify and control/limit connections to and use of external systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]connections to external systems are identified;
  2. [b]the use of external systems is identified;
  3. [c]connections to external systems are verified;
  4. [d]the use of external systems is verified;
  5. [e]connections to external systems are controlled/limited; and
  6. [f]the use of external systems is controlled/limited.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.21Access Control

Portable Storage Use

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Portable storage restrictions need to address use on external systems, not just use inside the organization.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Limit use of portable storage devices on external systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the use of portable storage devices containing CUI on external systems is identified and documented;
  2. [b]limits on the use of portable storage devices containing CUI on external systems are defined; and
  3. [c]the use of portable storage devices containing CUI on external systems is limited as defined.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AC.L2-3.1.22Access Control

Control Public Information

Score: 1 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: AC.L1-b.1.iv

Public-release control must operate before publication and after an accidental disclosure.

View 5 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Control CUI posted or processed on publicly accessible systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]individuals authorized to post or process information on publicly accessible systems are identified;
  2. [b]procedures to ensure CUI is not posted or processed on publicly accessible systems are identified;
  3. [c]a review process is in place prior to posting of any content to publicly accessible systems;
  4. [d]content on publicly accessible systems is reviewed to ensure that it does not include CUI; and
  5. [e]mechanisms are in place to remove and address improper posting of CUI.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AT.L2-3.2.1Awareness and Training

Role-Based Risk Awareness

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Awareness evidence should show that people understand the risks associated with their own system activities.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Ensure that managers, systems administrators, and users of organizational systems are made aware of the security risks associated with their activities and of the applicable policies, standards, and procedures related to the security of those systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]security risks associated with organizational activities involving CUI are identified;
  2. [b]policies, standards, and procedures related to the security of the system are identified;
  3. [c]managers, systems administrators, and users of the system are made aware of the security risks associated with their activities; and
  4. [d]managers, systems administrators, and users of the system are made aware of the applicable policies, standards, and procedures related to the security of the system.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AT.L2-3.2.2Awareness and Training

Role-Based Training

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Security responsibilities require training that enables the assigned work, not just annual awareness.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Ensure that personnel are trained to carry out their assigned information security-related duties and responsibilities.

Determine if:

  1. [a]information security-related duties, roles, and responsibilities are defined;
  2. [b]information security-related duties, roles, and responsibilities are assigned to designated personnel; and
  3. [c]personnel are adequately trained to carry out their assigned information security- related duties, roles, and responsibilities.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AT.L2-3.2.3Awareness and Training

Insider Threat Awareness

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Insider-threat training should connect recognizable indicators with a clear reporting path.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Provide security awareness training on recognizing and reporting potential indicators of insider threat.

Determine if:

  1. [a]potential indicators associated with insider threats are identified; and
  2. [b]security awareness training on recognizing and reporting potential indicators of insider threat is provided to managers and employees.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AU.L2-3.3.1Audit and Accountability

System Auditing

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Audit coverage begins with the activities the organization needs to reconstruct, not the volume of logs collected.

View 6 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Create and retain system audit logs and records to the extent needed to enable the monitoring, analysis, investigation, and reporting of unlawful or unauthorized system activity.

Determine if:

  1. [a]audit logs needed (i.e., event types to be logged) to enable the monitoring, analysis, investigation, and reporting of unlawful or unauthorized system activity are specified;
  2. [b]the content of audit records needed to support monitoring, analysis, investigation, and reporting of unlawful or unauthorized system activity is defined;
  3. [c]audit records are created (generated);
  4. [d]audit records, once created, contain the defined content;
  5. [e]retention requirements for audit records are defined; and
  6. [f]audit records are retained as defined.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AU.L2-3.3.2Audit and Accountability

User Accountability

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

An audit trail is useful for accountability only when an action can be attributed to a particular user.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Ensure that the actions of individual system users can be uniquely traced to those users so they can be held accountable for their actions.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the content of the audit records needed to support the ability to uniquely trace users to their actions is defined; and
  2. [b]audit records, once created, contain the defined content.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AU.L2-3.3.3Audit and Accountability

Event Review

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Logged-event selections must be reviewed as systems, risks, and investigation needs change.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Review and update logged events.

Determine if:

  1. [a]a process for determining when to review logged events is defined;
  2. [b]event types being logged are reviewed in accordance with the defined review process; and
  3. [c]event types being logged are updated based on the review.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AU.L2-3.3.4Audit and Accountability

Audit Failure Alerting

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Logging failure must be detectable even when the failure itself stops normal event delivery.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Alert in the event of an audit logging process failure.

Determine if:

  1. [a]personnel or roles to be alerted in the event of an audit logging process failure are identified;
  2. [b]types of audit logging process failures for which alert will be generated are defined; and
  3. [c]identified personnel or roles are alerted in the event of an audit logging process failure.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AU.L2-3.3.5Audit and Accountability

Audit Correlation

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Correlation should connect review, analysis, and reporting across relevant records to support an investigation.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Correlate audit record review, analysis, and reporting processes for investigation and response to indications of unlawful, unauthorized, suspicious, or unusual activity.

Determine if:

  1. [a]audit record review, analysis, and reporting processes for investigation and response to indications of unlawful, unauthorized, suspicious, or unusual activity are defined; and
  2. [b]defined audit record review, analysis, and reporting processes are correlated.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AU.L2-3.3.6Audit and Accountability

Reduction & Reporting

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Reduction and reporting should make relevant audit evidence retrievable without losing its meaning.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Provide audit record reduction and report generation to support on-demand analysis and reporting.

Determine if:

  1. [a]an audit record reduction capability that supports on-demand analysis is provided; and
  2. [b]a report generation capability that supports on-demand reporting is provided.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AU.L2-3.3.7Audit and Accountability

Authoritative Time Source

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Reliable event chronology depends on a defined authoritative time source and working synchronization.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Provide a system capability that compares and synchronizes internal system clocks with an authoritative source to generate time stamps for audit records.

Determine if:

  1. [a]internal system clocks are used to generate time stamps for audit records;
  2. [b]an authoritative source with which to compare and synchronize internal system clocks is specified; and
  3. [c]internal system clocks used to generate time stamps for audit records are compared to and synchronized with the specified authoritative time source.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AU.L2-3.3.8Audit and Accountability

Audit Protection

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Protecting audit evidence requires controls against unauthorized reading, alteration, and deletion.

View 6 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Protect audit information and audit logging tools from unauthorized access, modification, and deletion.

Determine if:

  1. [a]audit information is protected from unauthorized access;
  2. [b]audit information is protected from unauthorized modification;
  3. [c]audit information is protected from unauthorized deletion;
  4. [d]audit logging tools are protected from unauthorized access;
  5. [e]audit logging tools are protected from unauthorized modification; and
  6. [f]audit logging tools are protected from unauthorized deletion.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
AU.L2-3.3.9Audit and Accountability

Audit Management

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Managing the logging function should be limited to an explicitly selected subset of privileged users.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Limit management of audit logging functionality to a subset of privileged users.

Determine if:

  1. [a]a subset of privileged users granted access to manage audit logging functionality is defined; and
  2. [b]management of audit logging functionality is limited to the defined subset of privileged users.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CM.L2-3.4.1Configuration Management

System Baselining

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

A baseline must describe the environment that exists and support comparison as it changes.

View 6 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Establish and maintain baseline configurations and inventories of organizational systems (including hardware, software, firmware, and documentation) throughout the respective system development life cycles.

Determine if:

  1. [a]a baseline configuration is established;
  2. [b]the baseline configuration includes hardware, software, firmware, and documentation;
  3. [c]the baseline configuration is maintained (reviewed and updated) throughout the system development life cycle;
  4. [d]a system inventory is established;
  5. [e]the system inventory includes hardware, software, firmware, and documentation; and
  6. [f]the inventory is maintained (reviewed and updated) throughout the system development life cycle.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CM.L2-3.4.2Configuration Management

Security Configuration Enforcement

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

A configuration standard must be enforced on deployed products, with deviations understood.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Establish and enforce security configuration settings for information technology products employed in organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]security configuration settings for information technology products employed in the system are established and included in the baseline configuration; and
  2. [b]security configuration settings for information technology products employed in the system are enforced.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CM.L2-3.4.3Configuration Management

System Change Management

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

A change record should establish what changed, who reviewed it, and whether implementation was authorized.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Track, review, approve or disapprove, and log changes to organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]changes to the system are tracked;
  2. [b]changes to the system are reviewed;
  3. [c]changes to the system are approved or disapproved; and
  4. [d]changes to the system are logged.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CM.L2-3.4.4Configuration Management

Security Impact Analysis

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Security impact analysis belongs before implementation, when the decision can still change.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Analyze the security impact of changes prior to implementation.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the security impact of changes to the system is analyzed prior to implementation.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CM.L2-3.4.5Configuration Management

Access Restrictions for Change

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligibleLocation planning flagged

Change authority needs both physical and logical restrictions that are defined, approved, and enforced.

View 8 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Define, document, approve, and enforce physical and logical access restrictions associated with changes to organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]physical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are defined;
  2. [b]physical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are documented;
  3. [c]physical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are approved;
  4. [d]physical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are enforced;CAP location planning
  5. [e]logical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are defined;
  6. [f]logical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are documented;
  7. [g]logical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are approved; and
  8. [h]logical access restrictions associated with changes to the system are enforced.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CM.L2-3.4.6Configuration Management

Least Functionality

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Least functionality starts with a defensible definition of essential capabilities.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Employ the principle of least functionality by configuring organizational systems to provide only essential capabilities.

Determine if:

  1. [a]essential system capabilities are defined based on the principle of least functionality; and
  2. [b]the system is configured to provide only the defined essential capabilities.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CM.L2-3.4.7Configuration Management

Nonessential Functionality

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Restrictions on nonessential functionality must reach programs, functions, ports, protocols, and services.

View 15 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Restrict, disable, or prevent the use of nonessential programs, functions, ports, protocols, and services.

Determine if:

  1. [a]essential programs are defined;
  2. [b]the use of nonessential programs is defined;
  3. [c]the use of nonessential programs is restricted, disabled, or prevented as defined;
  4. [d]essential functions are defined;
  5. [e]the use of nonessential functions is defined;
  6. [f]the use of nonessential functions is restricted, disabled, or prevented as defined;
  7. [g]essential ports are defined;
  8. [h]the use of nonessential ports is defined;
  9. [i]the use of nonessential ports is restricted, disabled, or prevented as defined;
  10. [j]essential protocols are defined;
  11. [k]the use of nonessential protocols is defined;
  12. [l]the use of nonessential protocols is restricted, disabled, or prevented as defined;
  13. [m]essential services are defined;
  14. [n]the use of nonessential services is defined; and
  15. [o]the use of nonessential services is restricted, disabled, or prevented as defined.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CM.L2-3.4.8Configuration Management

Application Execution Policy

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Application execution control requires an explicit policy and evidence that execution follows it.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Apply deny-by-exception (blacklisting) policy to prevent the use of unauthorized software or deny-all, permit-by-exception (whitelisting) policy to allow the execution of authorized software.

Determine if:

  1. [a]a policy specifying whether whitelisting or blacklisting is to be implemented is specified;
  2. [b]the software allowed to execute under whitelisting or denied use under blacklisting is specified; and
  3. [c]whitelisting to allow the execution of authorized software or blacklisting to prevent the use of unauthorized software is implemented as specified.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CM.L2-3.4.9Configuration Management

User-Installed Software

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

User-installed software must be both controlled and monitored.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Control and monitor user-installed software.

Determine if:

  1. [a]a policy for controlling the installation of software by users is established;
  2. [b]installation of software by users is controlled based on the established policy; and
  3. [c]installation of software by users is monitored.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.1Identification and Authentication

Identification

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: IA.L1-b.1.v

Identification should distinguish people, their processes, and devices before access decisions are made.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Identify system users, processes acting on behalf of users, and devices.

Determine if:

  1. [a]system users are identified;
  2. [b]processes acting on behalf of users are identified; and
  3. [c]devices accessing the system are identified.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.2Identification and Authentication

Authentication

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: IA.L1-b.1.vi

Authentication must verify the relevant identity before access is granted.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Authenticate (or verify) the identities of users, processes, or devices, as a prerequisite to allowing access to organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the identity of each user is authenticated or verified as a prerequisite to system access;
  2. [b]the identity of each process acting on behalf of a user is authenticated or verified as a prerequisite to system access; and
  3. [c]the identity of each device accessing or connecting to the system is authenticated or verified as a prerequisite to system access.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.3Identification and Authentication

Multifactor Authentication

Score: 3 or 5 POA&M: Not eligible

MFA coverage must be assessed by account type and access type, not by enrollment percentage alone.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Use multifactor authentication for local and network access to privileged accounts and for network access to non-privileged accounts.

Determine if:

  1. [a]privileged accounts are identified;
  2. [b]multifactor authentication is implemented for local access to privileged accounts;
  3. [c]multifactor authentication is implemented for network access to privileged accounts; and
  4. [d]multifactor authentication is implemented for network access to non-privileged accounts.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.4Identification and Authentication

Replay-Resistant Authentication

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Replay resistance concerns whether captured authentication information can be reused to obtain access.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Employ replay-resistant authentication mechanisms for network access to privileged and non-privileged accounts.

Determine if:

  1. [a]replay-resistant authentication mechanisms are implemented for network account access to privileged and non-privileged accounts.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.5Identification and Authentication

Identifier Reuse

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Identifier reuse restrictions preserve accountability when people or systems leave and replacements arrive.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Prevent reuse of identifiers for a defined period.

Determine if:

  1. [a]a period within which identifiers cannot be reused is defined; and
  2. [b]reuse of identifiers is prevented within the defined period.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.6Identification and Authentication

Identifier Handling

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Inactive identifiers need a defined disablement threshold and a process that actually applies it.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Disable identifiers after a defined period of inactivity.

Determine if:

  1. [a]a period of inactivity after which an identifier is disabled is defined; and
  2. [b]identifiers are disabled after the defined period of inactivity.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.7Identification and Authentication

Password Complexity

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Password requirements must be enforced when passwords are created or changed.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Enforce a minimum password complexity and change of characters when new passwords are created.

Determine if:

  1. [a]password complexity requirements are defined;
  2. [b]password change of character requirements are defined;
  3. [c]minimum password complexity requirements as defined are enforced when new passwords are created; and
  4. [d]minimum password change of character requirements as defined are enforced when new passwords are created.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.8Identification and Authentication

Password Reuse

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Password history should enforce the specified number of generations across relevant password stores.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Prohibit password reuse for a specified number of generations.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the number of generations during which a password cannot be reused is specified and
  2. [b]reuse of passwords is prohibited during the specified number of generations.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.9Identification and Authentication

Temporary Passwords

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

A temporary password should lead directly to a required permanent-password change.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Allow temporary password use for system logons with an immediate change to a permanent password.

Determine if:

  1. [a]an immediate change to a permanent password is required when a temporary password is used for system logon.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.10Identification and Authentication

Cryptographically-Protected Passwords

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Password protection must cover storage and transmission, including secondary copies created by operations.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Store and transmit only cryptographically-protected passwords.

Determine if:

  1. [a]passwords are cryptographically protected in storage; and
  2. [b]passwords are cryptographically protected in transit.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IA.L2-3.5.11Identification and Authentication

Obscure Feedback

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Authentication feedback should not expose the secret being entered.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Obscure feedback of authentication information.

Determine if:

  1. [a]authentication information is obscured during the authentication process.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IR.L2-3.6.1Incident Response

Incident Handling

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Incident handling is an operational capability with people and decisions, not just a response-plan document.

View 7 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Establish an operational incident-handling capability for organizational systems that includes preparation, detection, analysis, containment, recovery, and user response activities.

Determine if:

  1. [a]an operational incident-handling capability is established;
  2. [b]the operational incident-handling capability includes preparation;
  3. [c]the operational incident-handling capability includes detection;
  4. [d]the operational incident-handling capability includes analysis;
  5. [e]the operational incident-handling capability includes containment;
  6. [f]the operational incident-handling capability includes recovery; and
  7. [g]the operational incident-handling capability includes user response activities.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IR.L2-3.6.2Incident Response

Incident Reporting

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

An incident record should connect discovery, decisions, required reporting, and follow-up.

View 6 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Track, document, and report incidents to designated officials and/or authorities both internal and external to the organization.

Determine if:

  1. [a]incidents are tracked;
  2. [b]incidents are documented;
  3. [c]authorities to whom incidents are to be reported are identified;
  4. [d]organizational officials to whom incidents are to be reported are identified;
  5. [e]identified authorities are notified of incidents; and
  6. [f]identified organizational officials are notified of incidents.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
IR.L2-3.6.3Incident Response

Incident Response Testing

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Response testing should reveal whether the organization can execute its incident process under realistic constraints.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Test the organizational incident response capability.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the incident response capability is tested.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MA.L2-3.7.1Maintenance

Perform Maintenance

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Maintenance needs a repeatable process for the systems that sustain the scoped environment.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Perform maintenance on organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]system maintenance is performed.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MA.L2-3.7.2Maintenance

System Maintenance Control

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligibleLocation planning flagged

Maintenance controls must cover the people and the means used to change or repair a system.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Provide controls on the tools, techniques, mechanisms, and personnel used to conduct system maintenance.

Determine if:

  1. [a]tools used to conduct system maintenance are controlled;
  2. [b]techniques used to conduct system maintenance are controlled;
  3. [c]mechanisms used to conduct system maintenance are controlled; and
  4. [d]personnel used to conduct system maintenance are controlled.CAP location planning
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MA.L2-3.7.3Maintenance

Equipment Sanitization

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Off-site repair can become a data transfer unless CUI is removed before equipment leaves control.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Ensure equipment removed for off-site maintenance is sanitized of any CUI.

Determine if:

  1. [a]equipment to be removed from organizational spaces for off-site maintenance is sanitized of any CUI.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MA.L2-3.7.4Maintenance

Media Inspection

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Diagnostic media should be checked before it is introduced into the system.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Check media containing diagnostic and test programs for malicious code before the media are used in organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]media containing diagnostic and test programs are checked for malicious code before being used in organizational systems that process, store, or transmit CUI.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MA.L2-3.7.5Maintenance

Nonlocal Maintenance

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Remote maintenance needs MFA at session establishment and termination when maintenance ends.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Require multifactor authentication to establish nonlocal maintenance sessions via external network connections and terminate such connections when nonlocal maintenance is complete.

Determine if:

  1. [a]multifactor authentication is used to establish nonlocal maintenance sessions via external network connections; and
  2. [b]nonlocal maintenance sessions established via external network connections are terminated when nonlocal maintenance is complete.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MA.L2-3.7.6Maintenance

Maintenance Personnel

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Maintenance personnel who lack required access authorization need active supervision.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Supervise the maintenance activities of maintenance personnel without required access authorization.

Determine if:

  1. [a]maintenance personnel without required access authorization are supervised during maintenance activities.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MP.L2-3.8.1Media Protection

Media Protection

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligibleLocation planning flagged

Media protection must cover paper and digital media through physical control and secure storage.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Protect (i.e., physically control and securely store) system media containing CUI, both paper and digital.

Determine if:

  1. [a]paper media containing CUI is physically controlled;
  2. [b]digital media containing CUI is physically controlled;
  3. [c]paper media containing CUI is securely stored; andCAP location planning
  4. [d]digital media containing CUI is securely stored.CAP location planning
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MP.L2-3.8.2Media Protection

Media Access

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Media access should be limited according to who is authorized to use the CUI on it.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Limit access to CUI on system media to authorized users.

Determine if:

  1. [a]access to CUI on system media is limited to authorized users.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MP.L2-3.8.3Media Protection

Media Disposal

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: MP.L1-b.1.vii

Sanitization evidence should identify the media, the method, and completion before disposal or reuse.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Sanitize or destroy system media containing CUI before disposal or release for reuse.

Determine if:

  1. [a]system media containing CUI is sanitized or destroyed before disposal; and
  2. [b]system media containing CUI is sanitized before it is released for reuse.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MP.L2-3.8.4Media Protection

Media Markings

Score: 1 POA&M: EligibleLocation planning flagged

Marking should reflect the applicable CUI category and distribution limits on the media actually used.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Mark media with necessary CUI markings and distribution limitations.

Determine if:

  1. [a]media containing CUI is marked with applicable CUI markings; andCAP location planning
  2. [b]media containing CUI is marked with distribution limitations.CAP location planning
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MP.L2-3.8.5Media Protection

Media Accountability

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Media transport needs both access control and accountability outside controlled areas.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Control access to media containing CUI and maintain accountability for media during transport outside of controlled areas.

Determine if:

  1. [a]access to media containing CUI is controlled; and
  2. [b]accountability for media containing CUI is maintained during transport outside of controlled areas.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MP.L2-3.8.6Media Protection

Portable Storage Encryption

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Transport protection should identify whether cryptography or qualifying alternative physical safeguards protect the digital media.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Implement cryptographic mechanisms to protect the confidentiality of CUI stored on digital media during transport unless otherwise protected by alternative physical safeguards.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the confidentiality of CUI stored on digital media is protected during transport using cryptographic mechanisms or alternative physical safeguards.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MP.L2-3.8.7Media Protection

Removable Media

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Removable-media control should address what can connect and how permitted use is governed.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Control the use of removable media on system components.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the use of removable media on system components is controlled.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MP.L2-3.8.8Media Protection

Shared Media

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Portable storage needs an identifiable owner before use is permitted.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Prohibit the use of portable storage devices when such devices have no identifiable owner.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the use of portable storage devices is prohibited when such devices have no identifiable owner.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
MP.L2-3.8.9Media Protection

Protect Backups

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Backup confidentiality must be evaluated where backup CUI is stored, including provider and offline locations.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Protect the confidentiality of backup CUI at storage locations.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the confidentiality of backup CUI is protected at storage locations.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
PS.L2-3.9.1Personnel Security

Screen Individuals

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Personnel screening must precede authorization to access systems containing CUI.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Screen individuals prior to authorizing access to organizational systems containing CUI.

Determine if:

  1. [a]individuals are screened prior to authorizing access to organizational systems containing CUI.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
PS.L2-3.9.2Personnel Security

Personnel Actions

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Personnel changes need coordinated protection of access, equipment, and information during and after the change.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Ensure that organizational systems containing CUI are protected during and after personnel actions such as terminations and transfers.

Determine if:

  1. [a]a policy and/or process for terminating system access and any credentials coincident with personnel actions is established;
  2. [b]system access and credentials are terminated consistent with personnel actions such as termination or transfer; and
  3. [c]the system is protected during and after personnel transfer actions.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
PE.L2-3.10.1Physical Protection

Limit Physical Access

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligibleLocation planning flagged

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: PE.L1-b.1.viii

Physical access control should connect an authorized-person list with the systems, equipment, and spaces it protects.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Limit physical access to organizational systems, equipment, and the respective operating environments to authorized individuals.

Determine if:

  1. [a]authorized individuals allowed physical access are identified;
  2. [b]physical access to organizational systems is limited to authorized individuals;CAP location planning
  3. [c]physical access to equipment is limited to authorized individuals; andCAP location planning
  4. [d]physical access to operating environments is limited to authorized individuals.CAP location planning
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
PE.L2-3.10.2Physical Protection

Monitor Facility

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligibleLocation planning flagged

Facility protection and monitoring must include infrastructure that supports the scoped systems.

View 4 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Protect and monitor the physical facility and support infrastructure for organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the physical facility where organizational systems reside is protected;CAP location planning
  2. [b]the support infrastructure for organizational systems is protected;CAP location planning
  3. [c]the physical facility where organizational systems reside is monitored; andCAP location planning
  4. [d]the support infrastructure for organizational systems is monitored.CAP location planning
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
PE.L2-3.10.3Physical Protection

Escort Visitors

Score: 1 POA&M: Not eligibleLocation planning flagged

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: PE.L1-b.1.ix

Visitor control requires escorting and monitoring activity, not simply recording arrival.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity.

Determine if:

  1. [a]visitors are escorted; andCAP location planning
  2. [b]visitor activity is monitored.CAP location planning
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
PE.L2-3.10.4Physical Protection

Physical Access Logs

Score: 1 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: PE.L1-b.1.ix

Physical-access logs should make relevant access reconstructable.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Maintain audit logs of physical access.

Determine if:

  1. [a]audit logs of physical access are maintained.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
PE.L2-3.10.5Physical Protection

Manage Physical Access

Score: 1 POA&M: Not eligibleLocation planning flagged

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: PE.L1-b.1.ix

Keys, badges, codes, and other physical-access devices need identifiable custody and lifecycle management.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Control and manage physical access devices.

Determine if:

  1. [a]physical access devices are identified;
  2. [b]physical access devices are controlled; andCAP location planning
  3. [c]physical access devices are managed.CAP location planning
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
PE.L2-3.10.6Physical Protection

Alternative Work Sites

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Alternate work locations need explicit safeguards for the CUI handled there.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Enforce safeguarding measures for CUI at alternate work sites.

Determine if:

  1. [a]safeguarding measures for CUI are defined for alternate work sites; and
  2. [b]safeguarding measures for CUI are enforced for alternate work sites.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
RA.L2-3.11.1Risk Assessment

Risk Assessments

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Risk assessment should explain the consequences of operating the actual systems and handling their CUI.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Periodically assess the risk to organizational operations (including mission, functions, image, or reputation), organizational assets, and individuals, resulting from the operation of organizational systems and the associated processing, storage, or transmission of CUI.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the frequency to assess risk to organizational operations, organizational assets, and individuals is defined; and
  2. [b]risk to organizational operations, organizational assets, and individuals resulting from the operation of an organizational system that processes, stores, or transmits CUI is assessed with the defined frequency.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
RA.L2-3.11.2Risk Assessment

Vulnerability Scan

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Vulnerability scanning needs both recurring coverage and a response to newly identified relevant vulnerabilities.

View 5 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Scan for vulnerabilities in organizational systems and applications periodically and when new vulnerabilities affecting those systems and applications are identified.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the frequency to scan for vulnerabilities in organizational systems and applications is defined;
  2. [b]vulnerability scans are performed on organizational systems with the defined frequency;
  3. [c]vulnerability scans are performed on applications with the defined frequency;
  4. [d]vulnerability scans are performed on organizational systems when new vulnerabilities are identified; and
  5. [e]vulnerability scans are performed on applications when new vulnerabilities are identified.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
RA.L2-3.11.3Risk Assessment

Vulnerability Remediation

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Remediation decisions should follow risk assessment and end with evidence that the vulnerability was addressed.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Remediate vulnerabilities in accordance with risk assessments.

Determine if:

  1. [a]vulnerabilities are identified; and
  2. [b]vulnerabilities are remediated in accordance with risk assessments.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CA.L2-3.12.1Security Assessment

Security Control Assessment

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Control assessment asks whether safeguards work in their actual application.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Periodically assess the security controls in organizational systems to determine if the controls are effective in their application.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the frequency of security control assessments is defined; and
  2. [b]security controls are assessed with the defined frequency to determine if the controls are effective in their application.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CA.L2-3.12.2Security Assessment

Operational Plan of Action

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Operational corrective-action plans should drive deficiencies toward resolution.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Develop and implement plans of action designed to correct deficiencies and reduce or eliminate vulnerabilities in organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]deficiencies and vulnerabilities to be addressed by the plan of action are identified;
  2. [b]a plan of action is developed to correct identified deficiencies and reduce or eliminate identified vulnerabilities; and
  3. [c]the plan of action is implemented to correct identified deficiencies and reduce or eliminate identified vulnerabilities.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CA.L2-3.12.3Security Assessment

Security Control Monitoring

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Ongoing monitoring should detect when a safeguard stops working as intended.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Monitor security controls on an ongoing basis to ensure the continued effectiveness of the controls.

Determine if:

  1. [a]security controls are monitored on an ongoing basis to ensure the continued effectiveness of those controls.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
CA.L2-3.12.4Security Assessment

System Security Plan

Assessment prerequisite POA&M: Not eligible

The SSP must describe the system being assessed, its boundaries, and how requirements are implemented.

View 8 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Develop, document, and periodically update system security plans that describe system boundaries, system environments of operation, how security requirements are implemented, and the relationships with or connections to other systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]a system security plan is developed;
  2. [b]the system boundary is described and documented in the system security plan;
  3. [c]the system environment of operation is described and documented in the system security plan;
  4. [d]the security requirements identified and approved by the designated authority as non-applicable are identified;
  5. [e]the method of security requirement implementation is described and documented in the system security plan;
  6. [f]the relationship with or connection to other systems is described and documented in the system security plan;
  7. [g]the frequency to update the system security plan is defined; and
  8. [h]system security plan is updated with the defined frequency.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.1System and Communications Protection

Boundary Protection

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: SC.L1-b.1.x

Boundary protection depends on knowing where communications enter, leave, and cross important internal divisions.

View 8 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Monitor, control, and protect communications (i.e., information transmitted or received by organizational systems) at the external boundaries and key internal boundaries of organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the external system boundary is defined;
  2. [b]key internal system boundaries are defined;
  3. [c]communications are monitored at the external system boundary;
  4. [d]communications are monitored at key internal boundaries;
  5. [e]communications are controlled at the external system boundary;
  6. [f]communications are controlled at key internal boundaries;
  7. [g]communications are protected at the external system boundary; and
  8. [h]communications are protected at key internal boundaries.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.2System and Communications Protection

Security Engineering

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Security engineering should be visible in the decisions used to design, develop, and change systems.

View 6 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Employ architectural designs, software development techniques, and systems engineering principles that promote effective information security within organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]architectural designs that promote effective information security are identified;
  2. [b]software development techniques that promote effective information security are identified;
  3. [c]systems engineering principles that promote effective information security are identified;
  4. [d]identified architectural designs that promote effective information security are employed;
  5. [e]identified software development techniques that promote effective information security are employed; and
  6. [f]identified systems engineering principles that promote effective information security are employed.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.3System and Communications Protection

Role Separation

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

User functions and system-management functions should be separated in the implemented architecture.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Separate user functionality from system management functionality.

Determine if:

  1. [a]user functionality is identified;
  2. [b]system management functionality is identified; and
  3. [c]user functionality is separated from system management functionality.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.4System and Communications Protection

Shared Resource Control

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Shared resources should not expose one user's information to another unauthorized user.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Prevent unauthorized and unintended information transfer via shared system resources.

Determine if:

  1. [a]unauthorized and unintended information transfer via shared system resources is prevented.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.5System and Communications Protection

Public-Access System Separation

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: SC.L1-b.1.xi

Public-facing components need physical or logical separation from internal networks.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Implement subnetworks for publicly accessible system components that are physically or logically separated from internal networks.

Determine if:

  1. [a]publicly accessible system components are identified; and
  2. [b]subnetworks for publicly accessible system components are physically or logically separated from internal networks.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.6System and Communications Protection

Network Communication by Exception

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Default-deny communication requires a rule set that permits justified traffic and rejects the rest.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Deny network communications traffic by default and allow network communications traffic by exception (i.e., deny all, permit by exception).

Determine if:

  1. [a]network communications traffic is denied by default; and
  2. [b]network communications traffic is allowed by exception.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.7System and Communications Protection

Split Tunneling

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Remote connectivity should prevent the prohibited simultaneous path to organizational and external networks.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Prevent remote devices from simultaneously establishing non-remote connections with organizational systems and communicating via some other connection to resources in external networks (i.e., split tunneling).

Determine if:

  1. [a]remote devices are prevented from simultaneously establishing non-remote connections with the system and communicating via some other connection to resources in external networks (i.e., split tunneling).
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.8System and Communications Protection

Data in Transit

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Transmission protection should follow CUI through every relevant communication segment.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Implement cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure of CUI during transmission unless otherwise protected by alternative physical safeguards.

Determine if:

  1. [a]cryptographic mechanisms intended to prevent unauthorized disclosure of CUI are identified;
  2. [b]alternative physical safeguards intended to prevent unauthorized disclosure of CUI are identified; and
  3. [c]either cryptographic mechanisms or alternative physical safeguards are implemented to prevent unauthorized disclosure of CUI during transmission.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.9System and Communications Protection

Connections Termination

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Network-connection termination should occur at session end or after the defined inactivity period.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Terminate network connections associated with communications sessions at the end of the sessions or after a defined period of inactivity.

Determine if:

  1. [a]a period of inactivity to terminate network connections associated with communications sessions is defined;
  2. [b]network connections associated with communications sessions are terminated at the end of the sessions; and
  3. [c]network connections associated with communications sessions are terminated after the defined period of inactivity.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.10System and Communications Protection

Key Management

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Cryptographic protection depends on the lifecycle and custody of its keys.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Establish and manage cryptographic keys for cryptography employed in organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]cryptographic keys are established whenever cryptography is employed; and
  2. [b]cryptographic keys are managed whenever cryptography is employed.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.11System and Communications Protection

CUI Encryption

Score: 3 or 5 POA&M: Limited encryption exception

FIPS validation must be tied to the cryptographic module and its use, not a general product claim.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Employ FIPS-validated cryptography when used to protect the confidentiality of CUI.

Determine if:

  1. [a]FIPS-validated cryptography is employed to protect the confidentiality of CUI.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.12System and Communications Protection

Collaborative Device Control

Score: 1 POA&M: EligibleLocation planning flagged

Collaborative devices should make their active state visible and prevent remote activation.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Prohibit remote activation of collaborative computing devices and provide indication of devices in use to users present at the device.

Determine if:

  1. [a]collaborative computing devices are identified;
  2. [b]collaborative computing devices provide indication to users of devices in use; andCAP location planning
  3. [c]remote activation of collaborative computing devices is prohibited.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.13System and Communications Protection

Mobile Code

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Mobile code needs defined permitted use and a way to control and monitor it.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Control and monitor the use of mobile code.

Determine if:

  1. [a]use of mobile code is controlled; and
  2. [b]use of mobile code is monitored.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.14System and Communications Protection

Voice over Internet Protocol

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

VoIP use should be governed and observable wherever it is relevant to the assessed environment.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Control and monitor the use of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technologies.

Determine if:

  1. [a]use of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technologies is controlled; and
  2. [b]use of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technologies is monitored.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.15System and Communications Protection

Communications Authenticity

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Session authenticity helps ensure that communication is with the intended endpoint and has not been substituted.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Protect the authenticity of communications sessions.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the authenticity of communications sessions is protected.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SC.L2-3.13.16System and Communications Protection

Data at Rest

Score: 1 POA&M: Eligible

Data-at-rest protection should cover every relevant stored copy of CUI.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Protect the confidentiality of CUI at rest.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the confidentiality of CUI at rest is protected.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SI.L2-3.14.1System and Information Integrity

Flaw Remediation

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: SI.L1-b.1.xii

Flaw remediation needs defined timing for identification, reporting, and correction.

View 6 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Identify, report, and correct system flaws in a timely manner.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the time within which to identify system flaws is specified;
  2. [b]system flaws are identified within the specified time frame;
  3. [c]the time within which to report system flaws is specified;
  4. [d]system flaws are reported within the specified time frame;
  5. [e]the time within which to correct system flaws is specified; and
  6. [f]system flaws are corrected within the specified time frame.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SI.L2-3.14.2System and Information Integrity

Malicious Code Protection

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: SI.L1-b.1.xiii

Malicious-code protection needs defined locations and working coverage at those locations.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Provide protection from malicious code at designated locations within organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]designated locations for malicious code protection are identified; and
  2. [b]protection from malicious code at designated locations is provided.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SI.L2-3.14.3System and Information Integrity

Security Alerts & Advisories

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Security alerts and advisories need a path from receipt to a decision and action.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Monitor system security alerts and advisories and take action in response.

Determine if:

  1. [a]response actions to system security alerts and advisories are identified;
  2. [b]system security alerts and advisories are monitored; and
  3. [c]actions in response to system security alerts and advisories are taken.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SI.L2-3.14.4System and Information Integrity

Update Malicious Code Protection

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: SI.L1-b.1.xiv

Malicious-code protection needs current updates when new releases become available.

View 1 assessment objective

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Update malicious code protection mechanisms when new releases are available.

Determine if:

  1. [a]malicious code protection mechanisms are updated when new releases are available.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SI.L2-3.14.5System and Information Integrity

System & File Scanning

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

✓ Includes Level 1 coverage: SI.L1-b.1.xv

Periodic scanning and real-time scanning address different detection opportunities.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Perform periodic scans of organizational systems and real-time scans of files from external sources as files are downloaded, opened, or executed.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the frequency for malicious code scans is defined;
  2. [b]malicious code scans are performed with the defined frequency; and
  3. [c]real-time malicious code scans of files from external sources as files are downloaded, opened, or executed are performed.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SI.L2-3.14.6System and Information Integrity

Monitor Communications for Attacks

Score: 5 POA&M: Not eligible

Attack monitoring should cover systems and both inbound and outbound communications relevant to the scope.

View 3 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Monitor organizational systems, including inbound and outbound communications traffic, to detect attacks and indicators of potential attacks.

Determine if:

  1. [a]the system is monitored to detect attacks and indicators of potential attacks;
  2. [b]inbound communications traffic is monitored to detect attacks and indicators of potential attacks; and
  3. [c]outbound communications traffic is monitored to detect attacks and indicators of potential attacks.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →
SI.L2-3.14.7System and Information Integrity

Identify Unauthorized Use

Score: 3 POA&M: Not eligible

Unauthorized use must be defined well enough that the organization can recognize it.

View 2 assessment objectives

Official requirement · DoD Level 2 guide

Identify unauthorized use of organizational systems.

Determine if:

  1. [a]authorized use of the system is defined; and
  2. [b]unauthorized use of the system is identified.
Evidence, assessment approach & sources →

A searchable CMMC reference

A practical CMMC assessment guide

Trace CMMC requirements from official wording to assessment objectives, practical evidence examples, and the constraints that shape readiness.

The 15 FAR-based Level 1 requirements map to 17 Level 2 requirements while retaining a distinct FCI assessment context.

Find the controls you need

Search by control identifier or topic, then filter by family, score, POA&M eligibility, or location-planning considerations. The Level 1 view links each FAR requirement to one or more related Level 2 requirements.

Understand each assessment objective

Open a control to review its official requirement, numbered objectives, and practical examples of evidence to examine, people to interview, and activities to demonstrate.

Organize your assessment review

Use score, POA&M status, and location-planning flags to focus your review. Map applicable objectives to evidence and responsible owners, then confirm decisions in the linked DoD guides and regulations.

This reference helps you prepare and organize a review. It does not conduct an assessment or determine an official score.

Primary sources and versions

Get your free consultation.